|
Progressivism
to New Deal: 1910 to 1939
1. Sectoral Patterns in the U.S. Economy, 1866 -1939 2. The Securities Bloc, 1914 -- 1939: The Morgan-First National Sector 3a. Eastern Rate Case: Shipppers Assocation, 1910: Chicago Subset 3b. Eastern Rate Case: Shipppers Assocation, 1910: New England Subset 4. Business Advisory Council, 1933 5. "Business Advisors Uphold President", May 3, 1935 6. Corporatists, 1939: Ezekiel List 7. Keynesian Elite in the Second New Deal State, 1927 – 1937 Input-Output approach is basis for this page My own work on the Keynesian Elite in the New Deal state goes up to 1939. At that time the political economy was dominted by three hegemons: 1) the export-oriented South and Atlantic and parts of Miss valley (grain exports via Illinois Central--but both Lincoln and Douglass tied to IC-CHECK) 2) the securities bloc 3) the emergent mass consumption sector It was the latter that provided the socio-economic sinew for modern progressivism (1890s to 1930s) whose key personanlity was Louis D. Brandeis. After
that my knowledge
drops off a cliff. Nevertheless, one can see a new kind of
cold-war progressive elite emerging in the Twentieth Century Fund and
the Committee for Economic Development. On the CED, see list
in Committee for
Economic Development, "The International Trade
Organization and the Reconstruction of World Trade" (New York, 1949)
Most interesting in this regard is the membership list of the Citizens' Committee for Reciprical World Trade of 1948, found in United States Senate, Committee on Finance, "Extending Authoirity to Negotiate Trade Agrements," 80th Congress, 2nd Session, Hearings (1948). Heading this Committee was Alger Hiss. Trade and the American dream: a social history of postwar trade policy By Susan A. Aaronson re citizens committee HISS LIST This approach differs from that of Mark S. Mizruchi, The American Corporate Network, 1904-1974 (Sage, 1982). Mizruchi defines sectors categorially/extrinsically (industrials, transports, insurances, investment banks, and banks--p. 113); I derive them immanently from input-output flows qua realization process. |
|||||||||||||||
| 1.
Sectoral Patterns in the U.S. Economy, 1869-1939 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
| 2. The Securities Bloc, 1914 -- 1939: The Morgan-First
National Sector SOURCE: National Resources Committee, The Structure of the American Economy, Part I (1939), pp. 309-312 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
|
3a.
Eastern Rate Case: Shippers Association, 1910: Chicago subset
3b. ERC 1910 New England Witnesses
SOURCE: Evidence Taken by the Interstate Commerece Comission in the Matter of Proposed Advances in Freight Rates by Carriers, August to December 1910, Senate Doc. 725, 61 Cong., 3 Sess., Vol. 1 pp. 6-15 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
| 4. Business Advisory Council, 1933 SOURCE: G.
William Domhoff, The
Higher Circles: The Governing Class in America (Random
house, 1971), pp. 213-215
|
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
| 5. "Business Advisors Uphold President", (New York Times, May 3, 1935) |
|||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||
6.
Corporatists, 1939: Ezekiel List
SOURCE:
U.S.
Department of
Agriculture, Record Group No. 16, "Business Conditions" Folder,
"Memorandum for the Secretary," Mordecai Ezekiel to Henry Wallace, April 11, 1939 |
|||||||||||||||
|