From the New Deal to Donald Trump
rampant patrimonialism and the nightmare of path-dependency
Randall Collins, "Patrimonial Alliances and Failures of State
Penetration: A Historical Dynamic of Crime, Corruption, Gangs, and
Mafias," The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 636, July, 2011.
Jane Schneider and Peter Schneider, "Mafia, Antimafia, and the Plural Cultures of Sicily." Current Anthropology, Vol. 46, No. 4 (August/October 2005), pp. 501-520
Patrimonialism* in action: Marie Yovanovitch says State Department 'being hollowed out from within' (UPI November 15, 2019):
"Moreover,
the attacks are leading to a crisis in the State Department as the
policy process is visibly unraveling, leadership vacancies go unfilled,
and senior and mid-level officers ponder an uncertain future and head
for the doors. The crisis has moved from the impact on individuals to
an impact on the institution.
|
This
page uses figurative elements, including graphs, tables,
charts,
and maps, to advance an analysis of the historical trajectory: the New Deal to Donald Trump. The
rule governing this page is to think in terms of these graphemes,
which form a set of synthetic a prioris. In certain cases a
text is made to function as a grapheme. The Lacan-Atwater
Signifying Chain is one such a case. Another is the Freud-Jamieson Black Hole of Liberalism.
They are also elementary particles. That is, they are the
building blocks of intelligibility within a hermeneutical modus
operandi. This may be what Deleuze means by transcendental
empiricism, which is consistent with Hegel's notion of the concrete
universal. Also Alexander Luria's The Making of Mind. Hermeneutical intelligibility vs. nomothetic explanation.
The first three graphemes
❖ The UAW: Bildungsproletarians and Plebeian Upstarts
❖ The Keynesian Elite
❖ Sectors of Capital
provide a necessary framework and point of departure for dealing with
the historical trajectory in question: from the New Deal to Donald Trump..
The next two graphemes
❖ PISA math scores, 2003-2015
❖ The Lacan Atwater Signifying Chain
deal
with cognitive and emotional processes.
These two graphemes contain the key to understanding the election of
2016 and the subsequent patrimonial bacchanale which grows
exponentially at the expense of rational-bureaucratic
organizations. With
the release on December 3, 2019 of the latest PISA math results, we see
an underappreciated aspect of American Exceptionalism: a cognitive
decline that makes us unique among "advanced" "capitalist" nations.
With the increasing fascistization of American government and politics,
we can now look back at the period 1938 to the present and understand
the key role played by LASC in making possible the particular herding
of primates known as the stupid party (the GOP). I look at these
process through the cognitive prism of the extended mind of the
bildungsproletarians and plebeian upstarts of southeast Michigan (
Figure 1).
|
|
the cartesian a priori
To understand the present situation,
thinking must first emancipate itself from the Cartesian
presuppositional matrix--the ontological presupposition of
the Cartesian self and its associated rhetorical elements of
consciousness, belief, motive, ideology and interest. Failure to
do so has the effect, a priori,
of blocking conceptualization of questions of ontology, agency,
intentionality, habitus, networks and contexts. And thinking must
approach the question of "ontology" as a question of genetic ontology: the performative dimensions of ontology.
|
some elementary particles |
Prelude to Trump: the Civil War in the UAW
Figure 1. The UAW: Bildungsproletarians and Plebeian Upstarts, 1933-1943:
Detroit and the lower great lakes (the Unity Caucus)

see list of interviews
Bildung and Ressentiment
Civil War, 1936 to 1941: Midland Steel (readings)
Schiller Hall: Bildung and Modernity (readings)
Joe Adams on atheism of his peers (the Reuther group and beyond) North Dakota, Postel, Montgomery, Guttman
Orality and Literacy
Paul Silver (Detroit Steel Products) on print vs. oral cultures on the shopfloor ONG LURIA
Saul Wellman (CP, Flint) on escape from the idiocy of orality
Rosenfeld and Musso
Bildungsproletarians and their other
Herman Burt on Polish women
Bill Jenkins on the Bulgarians
Williams et. al. on hillbillies in Pontiac LIST n=37
Shelton Tappes and Herman Burt on Uncle Toms
Frank Fagan on the "Americans"
Plebeian upstarts
Emergence of a UAW local
Bud Simon's letter; robt travis letter
Departmental biographies
Frank Fagan on welding and welders
Joe Adams and Art Grudzen on the Trim department
Edmund Kord's synoptic view
the Flying Squadrons: a workers' militia?
Events
Bud Simon on the firing of the two welders
•John Anderson re 3 locals
•John Anderson on CP in flux, critical period (this is part of Thermidor)
Joe Adams on 1943 strike
Earl Reynolds on first encounter
Edmund Kord on stubb out cigarettes
|
|
from Immanuel Kant to Donald Trump
"Thoughts without intuitions are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind."
"Philosophy always arrives too late . . . . The Owl of Minerva takes flight only as the dusk begins to fall."
"Hegel
remarks somewhere that all great world-historic facts and personages
appear, so to speak, twice. He forgot to add: the first time as
tragedy, the second time as farce."
History without philosophy is only a screen on which to project the shibboleths of our time.
Hitler is to Trump as tragedy is to farce.
|
United States Population Density, 2000
Midwest Auto Parts, 2006

|
Figure 2. U.S. Political Economy by Sector, 1910 to 1939
input-output matrices: capital formations and the two-party system

|
Figure 3.
The Keynesian Elite in the New Deal state

Source: "Membership List, May 1927," in the Morris L. Cooke Papers, box 66,
FDR Library; and United States Government Manual 1937
for more info on Fig.2 click on Keynesian Elite: Career Matrix
also: the Papers of John M. Carmody
Joanna Bockman. Markets in the Name of Socialism: The Left-Wing Origins of Neoliberalism (Stanford University Press, 2011): three reviews |
from OED, grapheme. 1955 H.
A. Gleason Introd. Descr. Ling. xxi. 302.
"A writing system consists of
a set of graphemes plus certain characteristic features of their use."
|
Graphemes
|
From the Sapient Paradox to Donald Trump:
the Guttenberg Parenthesis and the Flynn effect
cognitive processes
The
election of 2016 occured in the context of the situation
indexed by Figure 4.
Many have commented on the cognitive performativity of the candidate
and then the President, but don't take seriously the historicity, fragility,
and reversibility of cognitive development as a cultural-historical
phenomenon.
Figure 4 is an effect of cultural-historical developmental processes, of which
schooling itself is only one of several key inputs affecting the
cognitive and cultural development of situated organisms (not Cartesian
selves). Cognitive development is not a normative, inevitable
process ("We were not born to read," Wolf). It is an effect of history and politics, as well as
evolution, and can suffer reversal or collapse. This indeed is what is happening, and on a colossal scale.
Cognitive development
is also not a solely ontogenetic process: the contextual and embedded
character of mind; the social character of mind and agency; and
the institutional and historical contexts of cognitive performativity must be borne in mind. (Jan Derry, Vygotsky, Philosophy, and Education, Wiley, 2013, pp. 17, 24)
first:and in the context of Rosenfeld & Musso: MAKE PAGE
The Trump phenomenon forces us to deal with these
processes because primitive level of cognitive performativity and the
sadism and racism--the fascism--of the modern Republican Party force us
to do so. He's not hurting the people he is suposed to be hurting"-----trump talks like a fourth
grader. sado-secual performativity at a pre-operation and
gestural level of cvognitive performativity. the degeneracy
Atwater--the right-wing political genius of his time
(remember Willie Horton?)--reveals the performative formula of the Southern Strategy (Invisible Hands: The Businessmen's Crusade Against the New Deal, Kim Phillips-Fein.)
|
|
Figure 4. PISA Math Scores, 2003 to 2015:
21
Developed Nations & East Asian Cities and City-States

|
The Trump Problematic: Part A, Emotional Processes
aggression, violence, and cruelty in humans: Patrimonialism Resurgent?
from
Mary Helen Immordino-Yang and Antonio R. Damasio, “We Feel, Therefore
We Learn: The Relevance of Affective and Social Neuroscience to
Education,” in Emotions, Learning, and the Brain: Exploring the Educational Implications of Affective Neuroscience (W. W. Norton & Company, 2015)
. . . learning is
dynamic, social, and context dependent because emotions are, and
emotions form a critical piece of how, what, when, and why people
think, remember, and learn. Intro, p. 17
In general, cognition and emotion are regarded as two interrelated aspects of human functioning. p. 36
two commentaries on Victor Nell, "Cruelty’s rewards: The gratifications of perpetrators and spectators," Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2006) 29, 211–257
1. from Mika Haritos-Fatouros, “Cruelty: A dispositional or a situational behavior in man?” Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2006) 29, p.230
The basic question remains,
however: How far are aggression, violence, and cruelty in humans today
the result of predisposition factors, or biological or archetypal
processes, and how far are they the result of cognitive/emotional
processes evoked by situational factors?
2. from Albert Bandura, “A murky portrait of human cruelty,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences (2006) 29, p. 225
At the macrosocial level,
Nell greatly exaggerates the prevalence of human cruelty. There
exist wide intercultural differences representing both warring and
pacific socities with large intracultural variations and even rapid
transformation of warring societies into peaceful ones.
|
|
Donald Trump: the First Ten Million Years

Two Sliding Scales, and the Deeps Roots of Patrimonialism
Juan Carlos Gomez, Apes, Monkees, Children and the Growth of Mind (Harvard University Press, 2004)
The
possibility that, at a reduced scale, the mind of an ape can be
upgraded by giving him, on the one hand, a regime of socally controlled
attention and interactive experiences with humans, and on the other, a
new, more explicit form of representing the world, would confer
dramatic support to the Vygotskian notion that higher cognition can be
created through cultural processes of develoment that change the nature
of cognitive ontogeny. (pp. 262-3)
|
Merlin Donald, A Mind So Rare: The Evolution of Human Consciousness (W. W. Norton & Company, 2001)
. . . modern culture contains within it a trace of each of our
previous stages of cognitive evolution. It still rests on the same old
primate brain capacity for episodic or event knowledge. But it has
three additional, uniquely human layers: a mimetic layer, an
oral-linguistic layer, and an external-symbolic layer. The minds of
individuals reflect these three ways of representing reality. (p. 262)
Merlin Donald, "The mind considered from a historical perspective:
human cognitive phylogenesis and the possibility of continuing
cognitive evolution." In D. Johnson & C. Ermeling (Eds.) The Future
of the Cognitive Revolution (Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 360-61
Mimetic representations are evident in human children before they
acquire language competence. . . . They continue to be important in
adults, taking the form of highly variable social customs, athletic
skills, and group expressive patterns (such as mass demonstrations of
aggression or rejection).
|
|
The Trump Problematic: Part B, Cognitive Processes Decognification: The President Who Doesen't Read
from Merlin Donald, A Mind So Rare: The Evolution of Human Consciousness (W. W. Norton & Company, 2001)
. . . modern culture contains within it a trace of each of our
previous stages of cognitive evolution. It still rests on the
same old primate brain capacity for episodic or event knowledge.
But it has three additional, uniquely human layers: a mimetic layer, an
oral-linguistic layer, and an external-symbolic layer. The minds
of individuals reflect these three ways of representing reality.
(p. 262)
from Merlin Donald, "The mind considered from a historical perspective:
human cognitive phylogenesis and the possibility of continuing
cognitive evolution." In D. Johnson & C. Ermeling (Eds.) The Future
of the Cognitive Revolution (Oxford University Press, 1997), pp. 360-61
Mimetic representations are evident in human children before they
acquire language competence. . . . They continue to be important
in adults, taking the form of highly variable social customs, athletic
skills, and group expressive patterns (such as mass demonstrations of
aggression or rejection).
|
|
From the Sapient Paradox to Donald Trump: the Guttenberg Parenthesis and the Flynn effect

|
Fascist Performativities? ---------->
Ressentiment and the Mechanisms of Defense is the Genetic
Ontology of Trump's Theatrics
Lee
Atwater has shown how the discursive and symbolic elements of the
Southern Strategy were generated through the construction of a
theatrical arena of the sado-sexual performativity that is the essence of the
GOP's mass appeal. Well before Trump, the evocation of evil and
the channelling of rage against a scapegoat was the stock-in-trade of
Republican politicians, who tapped into and gave expression to " . . .
a whole tremulous realm of subterranean revenge, inexhaustible
and insatiable . . . " (Nietzsche, Geneology of Morals, III. 14)
The rhetorical violence of Trump rallies, not ideology and policies, is
what is fundamental. The Trump performances--the audience, the
cultural-historical context, and Trump himself as a therapeutic object
with which the audience member can identify--become intelligible when
viewed through the prism of certain key concepts:
• Nietzsche's concept of ressentiment;
• psychoanalysis's concept of the mechanisms of defense;
• Wilbur Cash's concept of the proto-Dorian convention;
• the Lacan-Atwater Signifying Chain;
• and Robert Paxton's concept of redemptive violence.
On the right there are not issues, but postures, gestures, various
encodings of the same sado-sexual reflex (the inner logic of
racism). Rage enacted in a political-media theater of violence,
sadism, and revenge. The cruelty of it all is the most important
thing. The vicarious thrill, the “enthusiasm for inflicting pain,
suffering, or humiliation”(OED*): this is what is seen at Trump
rallies. The GOP's performative cadre are specialists in
herding hominids of a particular cultural-historical configuration (ressentiment). Hence the concept of semiotic regime.
*Oxford English Dictionary online, s.v. "Sadism" |
|
the Lacan-Atwater Signifying Chain
from
Wikipedia:
(Lee
Atwater's Infamous 1981 Interview on the Southern Strategy)
As a member of the
Reagan administration in 1981, Atwater gave an
anonymous interview to political scientist Alexander P. Lamis. Part of
the interview was printed in Lamis's book The Two-Party South, then
reprinted in Southern Politics in the 1990s with Atwater's name
revealed. . . . Atwater talked about the Republican Southern Strategy
and Ronald Reagan's version of it:
Atwater:
As to the whole Southern strategy that Harry S. Dent, Sr. and others
put together in 1968, opposition to the Voting Rights Act would have
been a central part of keeping the South. Now you don't have to do
that. All you have to do to keep the South is for Reagan to run in
place on the issues he's campaigned on since 1964 and that's fiscal
conservatism, balancing the budget, cut taxes, you know, the whole
cluster.
Questioner:
But the fact is, isn't it, that Reagan does get to the Wallace voter
and to the racist side of the Wallace voter by doing away with legal
services, by cutting down on food stamps?
Atwater:
You start out in 1954 by saying, "Nigger, nigger, nigger." By 1968 you
can't say "nigger"—that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like
forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so
abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these
things you're talking about are totally economic things and a by-product
of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites. And subconsciously
maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if
it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away
with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me—because
obviously sitting around saying, "We want to cut this," is much more
abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract
than "Nigger, nigger."
|
|
A Neo-Kantian Views the semiosphere
Kathleen
Hall Jamieson and Joseph N. Cappella reveal the utter incapacity of the
liberal discursive field (e.g., MSNBC, New York Times) to comprehend,
understand, or even simply observe the sado-sexual obsessiveness of
right-wing rhetorical performativity.
|
|
the Freud-Jamieson Black Hole of Liberalism
from Kathleen Hall Jamieson and Joseph N. Cappella, Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Estabisment (Oxford Univeristy Press, 2008), p.p. 188-89. (Emphasis added.)
Limbaugh's
attempts at gender-based "humor" are of the locker room variety.
As the California gubernatorial recall was heating up, Limbaugh
informed his folowers that Leutenant Governor Cruz Bustamante--"whose
name loosely translates into Spanish for 'large breasts'--leads the
Terminator by a few pionts" (August 18, 2003). A photomontage on
the Limbaugh website shows a photograph of Schwartzenegger's head and
shoulders from his Pumping Iron days as a body builder. A naked
woman has been transposed onto his shoulders. Over her breasts is
a sign reading BUSTAMONTE. When Madonna endorsed General Wesley
Clark, Limbaugh reported that she had "opened herself" to him.
Why the vulgarity in this message does not alienate the churchgoing
conservatives in his audiences a question for which we have no ready
answer.
|
|
Walter J. Ong, Orality and Literacy; and the Flynn effect
The figure above (unnumbered)--
|
the President Who Doesn't Read
|
A. Donald Trump as Performative Complex
The
election of 2016 occured in the context of the situation
indexed by Figure 1, and is inconceivable outside this context.
But it cannot be understood until we add the emtional to the
cognitive-performative side of life. This can be donethrough the
tudy of georaphy and the media.
Many have commented on the cognitive performativity of the candidate
and then the President, but don't take seriously the historicity, fragility,
and reversibility of cognitive development as a cultural-historical
phenomenon; and thus, the significance of Donald Trump.
Figure 2 is an effect of cultural-historical developmental processes, of which
schooling itself is only one of several key inputs affecting the
cognitive and cultural development of situated organisms (not Cartesian
selves). Cognitive development is not a normative, inevitable
process (Wolf). It is an effect of history and politics, as well as
evolution, and can suffer reversal or collapse. This indeed is what is happening, and on a colossal scale.
Cognitive development
is also not a solely ontogenetic process: the contextual and embedded
character of mind; the social character of mind and agency; and
the institutional and historical contexts of cognitive performativity must be borne in mind. (Jan Derry, Vygotsky, Philosophy, and Education, Wiley, 2013, pp. 17, 24)
Figure 1 suggests that a
catastrophic decline in cognitive performativity preceded and made
possible the fascist-patrimonial victory of November 2016.
Focusing
on the person of the Chief Executive and his various performative
moments obliterates the cultural-historical dimensions of history. The brutishness in
language and behavior that are the chief characteristics of Trump's
mass-oriented performances must be understood as manifestations of
something of great ontological significance. To understand this,
thinking must first emancipate itself from the Cartesian
presuppositional matrix--the ontological presupposition of
the Cartesian self and its associated rhetorical elements of
consciousness, belief, motive, ideology and interest. Failure to
do so has the effect, a priori,
of blocking conceptualization of questions of ontology, agency,
intentionality, habitus, networks and contexts. And thinking must
approach the question of "ontology" as a question of genetic ontology
(see below): the performative dimensions of ontology.
|
|
But the new deal was bildung personified. the attack on the new
deal, which one can date variously from the “Rush Limbaugh” moment of
1933/4 (Wirt-Rand) to the defeat of FDR’s purge efforts in the
Democratic primaries of 1938, to the masive defeat of new deal
democrats in the industrial cities of the midwest in the November 1938
congressional elections. (Patterson)
But agency is composed of reason and passion, and so is both cognitive and emotional in its enactment.
•1The
election of 2016 occured in the context of the situation
indexed by Figure 4.
Many have commented on the cognitive performativity of the candidate
and then the President, but don't take seriously the historicity, fragility,
and reversibility of cognitive development as a cultural-historical
phenomenon.
Figure 4 is an effect of cultural-historical developmental processes, of which
schooling itself is only one of several key inputs affecting the
cognitive and cultural development of situated organisms (not Cartesian
selves). Cognitive development is not a normative, inevitable
process (Wolf). It is an effect of history and politics, as well as
evolution, and can suffer reversal or collapse. This indeed is what is happening, and on a colossal scale.
Cognitive development
is also not a solely ontogenetic process: the contextual and embedded
character of mind; the social character of mind and agency; and
the institutional and historical contexts of cognitive performativity must be borne in mind. (Jan Derry, Vygotsky, Philosophy, and Education, Wiley, 2013, pp. 17, 24)
Figure 4 suggests that a decline in cognitive performativity in the contexts that matter preceded and made
possible the fascist-patrimonial victory of November 2016.
•2Focusing
on the person of the Chief Executive and his various performative
moments obliterates the cultural-historical dimensions of history. The brutishness in
language and behavior
that are the chief characteristics of Trump's
mass-oriented performances must be understood as manifestations of
something of great ontological significance. Corresponding to
this symbolic brutishness in the spectacle of politics as thater of
ressentiment is the bacchanal of sleaze and corruption that is the essence of Trump's governing philosphy.
is the mark of a rampant patrimonial
regime of a primarily predatory nature in the process of devouring the
legal-bureaucratic state.
To understand this,
thinking must first emancipate itself from the Cartesian
presuppositional matrix--the ontological presupposition of
the Cartesian self and its associated rhetorical elements of
consciousness, belief, motive, ideology and interest. Failure to
do so has the effect, a priori,
of blocking conceptualization of questions of ontology, agency,
intentionality, habitus, networks and contexts. And thinking must
approach the question of "ontology" as a question of genetic ontology: the performative dimensions of ontology.
|
the consituting of cultural-historical bodies: the body Trump
I proceeded immanently, from within the cultural-historical discursive fields generated by KE New Deal and UAW Det and SE Mich
|
on human nature
Chase
Dupre
Sahlins
Renfrew
|
Margaret Jacob re. Bildung: bildung and capitalism, and markets; and also vs. both.
Norm Bully and his father
donald trump may be in a class by himself
the deep state (paranaoid-schizoid positon)
ehen pres uses power for personal gain--misses the bigger picture: this what patrimonial regimes and primate studies do
|
on the cognitive-linguistic gulf between oral and print culture
Luria
Ong
Rosenfeld
Flynn
|
On
December 2 1851, followers of President Louis Bonaparte (Napoleon's
nephew) broke up the Legislative Assembly and established a
dictatorship. A year later, Louis Bonaparte proclaimed himself Emperor
Napoleon III.
Frank Fagan and workers wanting him to drive a fancy car (Proto-Dorian convention/patrimonialism)
|
the mid-nineteenth century turn
Karl Marx, The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (1852)
Christian J. Emden, Nietzsche on Language, Consciousness, and the Body (U. of Illinois, 2005); Nietzsche's Naturalism (Cambridge, 2014)
Philippe-Joseph Salazar, "Reconnaissances of Marx", Philosophy & Rhetoric, Vol. 48, No. 4, 2015
Jerrold Seigel, Modernity and Bourgeois Life: Society, Politics, and Culture in England, France and Germany since 1750 (Cambridge, 2012)
|
Progressivism and Liberalism are opposites, not twins. The genetic ontology of Progressivism is Bildung and the Will to Power; The genetic ontology of Liberalism is Nihilism.
Today's liberalism is referred as the left, covering over the
genetic-ontological transformation of the post-war years (see Hall et.
al.) The New Deal is not represented in the above figure and table, The Two-Party System: Semiotic Regimes. Donald Trump is a result of this genetic-ontological transformation.
|
Donald Trump and the sliding scale*
the Sapient Paradox
the Gutenberg Parenthesis
the Flynn effect
the Wolf premonitions
*Juan Carlos Gomez, Apes, Monkees, Children and the Growth of Mind (Harvard University Press, 2004)
The
possibility that, at a reduced scale, the mind of an ape can be
upgraded by giving him, on the one hand, a regime of socally controlled
attention and interactive experiences with humans, and on the other, a
new, more explicit form of representing the world, would confer
dramatic support to the Vygotskian notion that higher cognition can be
created through cultural processes of develoment that change the nature
of cognitive ontogeny. (pp. 262-3)
|
This
election result was decades in the making. On the one hand, a variety
of fascist and ultra-nationalist currents worldwide found fertile soil
in the displaced and discarded "white" populations that were the
enormous if unintended by-product of post-industrial capitalism's truly
explosive development. On the other hand, the FF-TS networks in Franklin D.
Roosevelt, which in its heyday (1935-1947) understood and attempted to
deal with this underlying dynamic of human capital liquidation and the
need for a global trading regime that was subservient to the objective
of national development--this party, over a period of decades, ceased
to be. (Block, Wolfe, Misruchi) Thermidor graphic
The remnants of that party of FDR (Bernie, Sherood Brown) were
eliminated by the Clinton revolution--the taking over of the Democratic
Party by the forces arrayed around the Democratic Leadership Council.
In place of the social democratic orientation of yesteryear,and more, general systems orientation
The transformation of Porgressivism into Liberalism (Clark, Ehrenberg, Zaretsky)
we got globalization uber alles. In place of an appeal to working class
needs and recognition of the life experience of working people, we got,
in this election, an appeal to college-educated women, a variety of
life-style groups, and minorities. Democratic surrogates and media
talking heads actually showed contempt for those stupid white people
who lived, for example, in my state of Michigan.
The polls were wrong because the ground had
shifted (and the cartesian trap exposed).
But also consider the role played by the Democratic Party in producing
this electoral result: In place of an appeal to working class needs and
recognition of the life experience of working people, we got, in this
election, an appeal to college-educated women, a variety of life-style
groups, and minorities. Democratic surrogates and media talking heads
actually showed contempt for those stupid white people who lived, for
example, in my state of Michigan.
Racism is real but also mutable, a psychological resource exploited by
right-wing politicians but dependent on context: globalization, and the
failure of the Democrats to address this existential threat to my rust
belt neighbors.
The four axes of ontological catastrophe can be placed in historical
contexts. Instead of the great dream of the Enlightenment that
was the core sensibility of Progressivism (the New Deal), Socialism
(Scandanavian Social Democracy), and Communism, we have:
a. the wreckage not only of socialism but more broadly of
Progressivism, of the entire cultural-historical self-formative project
(Bildung) that grew out of the Enlightenment and gave us the Russian
revolution, Scandinavian Social Democracy, and the American New Deal. Bildunsproletarians and plebeian upstarts
b. the persistence of the political culture, psychological dispositions
and praxiological modalities of ressentiment (the inner life of racism
and fascism)
c. the triumph of nihilism as the socio-cultural engineering project of
global corporate networks of unimaginable reach and power, generating
an entropic process of disindividuation. Mass consumption as a
mode of absorption and transformation of the organism. The
fiction of freedom, the subversion of individuation, the inner logic of
addiction, the commodification of distress, the infantilization of
public discourse . . . in short, the dissipation of the species homo
sapiens sapiens into a proliferation of effects. DSM-V as the
operating manual of the post-human ontology. The incredible
shrinking self. This is the new Democratic party whose
rhetorical vector is liberal not progressive
|
|
the Two-Party System: Semiotic Regimes
(Media as Spectacle)
|
the Two-Party System: Semiotic Regimes
|
the Two-Party System: Semiotic Regimes
|
LEFT*
|
RIGHT
|
Topology
|
depressive
|
paranoid-schizoid
|
Political style
|
progressive
|
proto-Dorian
|
Cognitive mode
|
concrete & pre-op
|
pre-op and gestural
|
Regime type
|
rational-bureaucratic
|
patrimonial
|
|
1. pro- and anti-war demonstrators' signs
from
CNN newscast, 4:00 to 6:00 PM, 9-15-07: pro- and anti-war
demonstrators'
signs (applying the concept of cognitive regime):
pro-war
demo signs: "Traitors Go to Hell!"
"Deport
Anti-war Protesters!"
"Treason!"
anti-war
demo signs: "End
the War Now!"
"U.S. Out of
Iraq!"
"Support the Troops!
End the War!"
2. rabids vs. thoughtfuls
Analysis
of comments sent to Connecticut
Post, August 31, 2006 re. Jonathon
Edington murder case (article no longer accessible)
|

|
Here are the sources for this conceptualization of the Two-Party System: Semiotic Regimes:
Simon Clarke, Social Theory, Psychoanalysis and Racism (Palgrave Macmillan; 2003)
Alain Ehrenberg, The Weariness of the Self: Diagnosing the History of Depression in the Contemporary Age (McGill-Queen's University Press, 2009)
Eli Zarestsky, Secrets of the Soul: A Social and Cultural History of Psychoanalysis (Vintage, 2005)
Darrin M. McMahon, Enemies of the Enlightement: the French Counter-Enlightenment and the Making of Modernity (Oxford University Press, 2001)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Note on use of the term "Left."
Progressivism and Liberalism are opposites, not twins. The genetic ontology of Progressivism is Bildung and the Will to Power; The genetic ontology of Liberalism is Nihilism.
Today's liberalism is referred as the left, covering over the
genetic-ontological transformation of the post-war years (see Hall et.
al.) The New Deal is not represented in the above figure and table, The Two-Party System: Semiotic Regimes. Donald Trump is a result of this genetic-ontological transformation. |
|
|
the performative complex of the Southern strategy
*from Dan T. Carter, From George Wallace to Newt Gingrich: Race in the Conservative Counterrevolution, 1963-1994 (Louisiana State U. Press, 1996), pp. 8-9.
The depth of Wallace’s racism—the
degree to which it was part of his core beliefs—was always
unclear. He sometimes manifested an air of apologetic cynicism;
when forced to break away from informal gatherings because of a
speaking engagement, he would often turn to his friends and ask to be
excused with a sheepish grin and a half-embarassed explanation: “I got
to give ‘em a little nigger talk.”
Seymour Wolfbein, a Labor Department
expert in the Kennedy administration, was convinced it was all an act.
. . . Wolfbein found Wallace fascinating and amusing, but hardly
sinister, a kind of roguish political con man eager to let him in on
the joke.
When confronted with the question of whether Wallace was
“sincere” in his racial views, a Montgomery attorney who knew the
governor well said it best. “If George had parachuted into the
Albanian countryside in the spring of 1962,” reflected John Kohn, one
of Wallace’s advisers in the 1960s, “he would have been head of the
collective farm by harvesttime, a member of the Communist Party by
midwinter, on his way to the district party meeting as a delegate by
the following year, and a member of the Comintern in two or three
years.” George, said Kohn, “could beieve whatever he needed to
believe.”
Cognitive Modalities: a summary of sources
|
Psychometrics ("Q"): Flynn, Nisbett, Ceci; Hernstein and Murray
•IQ tests
•PISA
•MEAP
|
Evolutionary: Donald, Mind: cognitive evolution Table 7.1 p. 260
•episodic (primate)
•mimetic (homo erectus, h. sapients)
•oral-mythic (h. sapiens sapiens)
•theoretic (required by modern capitalism*)
•post-theoretic (Foucault, Sellars, Deleuze)
|
Psychoanalytic: Freud-Klein: mechanisms of defense
•projection
•displacement
•reaction formation
•denial
•identification
|
Cultural-historical: Vygotsky, Luria, Bruner, Calvin, Flynn, Tomasello
• zone of proximal development
• joint intentionality
• intersubjectivity
|
|
|
Cognitive-linguistic Cardinality
אi
|
|
the Quantum Heterogeneity of Dasein in the context of Merlin Donald, A Mind so Rare, Table 7.1, p. 260
(Appologies to Georg Cantor)
|
i=4
|
Internet and the Extended Mind
|
i=3
|
Foucault (Kant Hegel Nietzsche)
|
i=2
|
Formal operational
|
i=1
|
Concrete operational
|
i=0
|
Oral-mythic/pre-operational
|
i=−1
|
Mimetic/gestural (homo erectus)
|
i=−2
|
Primate semiosis
|
|
The Development of Children Sixth Edition by Cynthia Lightfoot, Michael Cole, and Sheila R. Cole
Laura E. Berk, Development Through the Lifespan
Jerome Kagan, The Human Spark: The Science of Human Development 2013
Piaget, Genetic Epistemology |
|
the political construction of identity
from
Joseph E. Lowndes, From the New Deal to the New Right: Race and the
Southern Origins of Modern Conservatism (Yale Univesity Press, 2008)
Politics is not merely the realm where preexisting interests,
grievances, and passions are given expression. Rather, it is in
and through politics that interests, grievances, and passions are
forged and new collective identities created. Backlash, the
ideological cornerstone and justification for modern conservatism,
masks what was a long-term process whereby various groups in different
places and times attempted to link racism, anti-government populism,
and economic conservatism into a discourse and institutional strategy
through linguistic appeals, party-building, social movement organizing,
and the exercise of state power. In the process, the very
interests and self-understanding of these groups were continually under
construction as they moved from coalition to collective political
identity. As opposed to being entrenched and traditionalist (or
reactionary, depending on one's politics), the Right that
developed is better viewed as contingent, mobile, and highly adaptive,
constantly responding to changing conditions on the ground. 4-5
אi
אi
A SYNTHETIC A PRIORI TO SET YOUR HAIR ON FIRE
PHILIP ROTH ON THE INDIVIDUAL (THE SELFY SAMESELF SELF)
the sleazo-sphere (Babbitt)
|

A Mind So Rare, Table 7.1 p. 260
|
|
iאiא
|
from What are some examples of Kant's synthetic a priori knowledge?
Kant thinks
that there lie in the human cognitive faculties certain forms which are
necessary for things to become objects of our cognition. If this is
true, then synthetic a priori judgments are possible, for since the
forms are necessary for there to be any experience whatsoever, we know
a priori, i.e. independently of any particular experience, that all
objects will conform to these forms. That is, the objects will have all
those properties that the forms impose on them. This Kant calls
transcendental idealism."
Just so. Below--elaborating on Kant/Hegel--I present several
graphemes that not by compulsion or immanent necessity, but rather by
varied atttempts to construct usable "synthetic a priori": here are
some of them. I call them elementary particles (ha ha)." |
א
|
|
אi
|
|